Haliburton Sanctioned for Destroying Gulf Spill Evidence & PLC Found Grossly Negligent


As reported by 360, A Louisiana federal judge sanctioned Halliburton Co. for destroying evidence related to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster amid a rash of decisions entered after the first phase of the trial on Thursday. U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier ordered the sanctions without detailing what they would be, while allowing motions to supplement the record of the first phase of the trial with details of Halliburton’s guilty plea to the destruction of evidence made last year. “The court finds that the deletion of the [evidence] was done intentionally and in bad faith,” the judge wrote. “The court also finds that this sanction does not amount to a default judgment, the dismissal of any of Halliburton’s claims or the disposal of any claims against Halliburton.” This latest blow to Halliburton comes just two days after the company agreed to pay nearly $1.1 billion to settle most private plaintiffs’ claims against Halliburton for its role in the disaster that sent millions of barrels of oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico. That settlement didn’t address any claims brought by states or the federal government. It also comes as the judge ruled Halliburton to be 3 percent at fault for the incident and that BP PLC must indemnify and release Halliburton relating to compensatory damage claims.

As reported by the WSJ the Court also found “PLC was grossly negligent in the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster, …, handing down a decision that could cost the company as much as $18 billion in pollution fines for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.Thursday’s decision could leave BP on the hook for far more than the $3.5 billion it had set aside for civil penalties under the U.S. Clean Water Act and likely would easily exceed the biggest previous fine under the statute.The $3.5 billion was based in part on BP’s expectation that the court would rule the company liable for simple negligence. U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier’s finding of gross negligence, or more reckless and extreme behavior, means BP faces a penalty of as much as $4,300 for each barrel of crude spilled in the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. That is nearly quadruple the maximum civil fine had the finding been simple negligence, which means the failure to take reasonable care.”

3.27 Million Dollar Trans Vaginal Mesh Verdict

Excellent news for the thousands of women who are suffering as a result of having this product placed in their body.A federal jury in West Virginia Friday delivered a verdict in favor of pelvic mesh survivor Jo Huskey for the pain and suffering she endured from a defective pelvic mesh device manufactured by industry leader JohnsonContinue Reading

FDA Assessment: Most Children are Exposed to Food Dyes | Food Safety News FDA Assessment: Most Children are Exposed to Food Dyes BY NEWS DESK | SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 Exposure assessments conducted by the Food and Drug Administration find that most American kids are exposed to food dyes. FDA has not yet published the fullContinue Reading

General Mills Imposes Forced Arbitration on Customers, then Backpedals after Public Admonishment

General Mills, manufacturer of Trix, Cheerios, Betty Crocker, Pillsbury and other foods, attempted to prohibit consumers from being able to sue if they have a consumer protection-related grievance. However, after considerably public backlash, the food manufacturer backed off on what essentially amounted to forced arbitration. In an effort to stop consumers from being able toContinue Reading

Johnson & Johnson Must Pay Out $1.2 Million Following Vaginal Mesh Jury Verdict

In the first ruling against Johnson & Johnson’s line of vaginal-mesh products, a Texas jury ruled that the TVT-O mesh sling was incorrectly designed. It awarded $1.2 million to Linda Batiste in compensatory damages. Batiste complained of pelvic pain while the device was inside of her. Johnson & Johnson is currently facing more than 12,000Continue Reading